Time to open up the energy market in Singapore

I guess most of you would have heard about the last minute 21% electricity bills hike starting Oct 2008.

It funny. Government giving us GST offset package in Oct, and straight away we are returning to them because of MRT fare hike, Bus fare hike, newspaper price increase and now electricity bill increase. Sometimes I rather the government not give us those offset package and spare us the increase. Oh wait…. these companies have been privatized (Although majority of their shares still belongs to Temasek Holdings). So it’s not the government’s fault that they are increasing prices.

Sorry, I digress.

I think it’s time we open up the energy market for more competitions to come in. Singapore Power (SP) has been privatized since Oct 1995. That’s 13 years of being a private entity without any competition in this market. SP still operate much like the government agency it used to be 13 years ago.

I’ve always heard from my dad and friends about how difficult the process was to apply for utilities. I didn’t know it was that bad until I experienced it first hand last month when I need to apply for electricity at my new office. Firstly, tons of documents are required. Some of them makes no logic at all. Then the inflexibility of the rules. I was terminating an account from the old office and apply for a new account for the new office. But I can’t transfer the deposit from the old account to the new account. I need to pay a new set of deposit for the new office and wait for them to release the deposit for the old office.

And what’s up with the deposit anyway? Why do we need to pay a huge deposit just to get electricity at our office and home? Do you know how many household and offices are using electricity from SP? How much deposit do they have in their banks? OK, I’m sure they are using the deposit for investment. And so long as you have a house/office, your deposit is as good as being theirs. That’s an excellent business model. Either you pay a deposit so that I can use that money to invest, else you will not get electricity. Since there is only one company in Singapore to get electricity, everyone has no choice but to pay the deposit.

I still remember in the past when you need to pay deposit to Singtel to apply for phoneline. But all these has been scraped since the opening up of the Telco market. We no longer need to pay deposit.

I always like to use the Telco market as example. I feel that the Telco market in Singapore is the best example of consumer benefiting from competition. Prices of electricity and manpower has been increasing all the time. But when was the last time the 3 Telco increase their charges? They even roll out new technology like 3G network without passing the cost to consumer. Competition is the key factor that kept our phone bills in check. The 3 Telco, like almost every company in Singapore, are experiencing increase in their operating cost. But instead of passing the cost down to the consumers like SP, they cut cost by being more efficient. Because they know that they cannot afford to be more expensive than their competitors.

But for the SP, there is no need for them to be more efficient. There is no need for them to keep their operating cost down. When the operating cost goes up, all they need to do is to increase the electricity bills. We, the consumers, can’t do anything because of the monopoly in the energy market. There is no alternative for us to switch to. There is no competition to keep the prices in check. There is no motivation for SP to be more cost effective.

I think it’s time we open up the energy market in Singapore so that we will not see another 21% price hike. And seriously, where is CASE? What are you guys doing about this 21% hike?

I complained to the lady at the SP counter about how troublesome and inflexible her company is when I was applying for electricity. (In a chit chat manner. Not bang table hor) I told her that it was a lot easier to apply for telephone line from Singtel. She replied to me saying “That is because we have no competitions in the market.”

And I couldn’t agree with her more.

Xizor pointed out that while Singapore electricity tariff is going up, Hong Kong electricity tariff is going down. Hong Kong has 2 companies supplying electricity to the resident. Competition is the key to keeping prices down.

All those in favor of opening up the energy market, say “aye”.

14 Responses to 'Time to open up the energy market in Singapore'

  1. pkchukiss says:

    Yes, the adjustments come without any conscious effort from the private entity to improve efficiency. It’s another case of half-f***ed privatisation, like our public transportation

    pkchukisss last blog post..Breakdown of my assignments this semester

  2. Ridz says:

    aye.

    a big f-ing aye!

    Ridzs last blog post..Kyle Lagrasso

  3. nicole says:

    aye!

    aye!

    aye!

  4. Tianhong says:

    aye.

    did they even have the conscience that most singaporeans doesn’t even had such increment? is it a burden to singaporeans? who is protecting the singaporeans? is this model of forcing the employee increment lower than gdp sustainable?

    are we even being loved by singapore? how is its own people going to be happy if they’re are having difficulty living for the present not to mention the future!

    i hope someone up there can answer us. I see disaster waiting for the average, jus-to-get-bye whose salary depends on the hours he/she works to get by.

  5. xizor2000 says:

    Nay.

    Unless there are legislations to safeguard us from manipulations by power producers like Enron. It might not be even comparable in our context, but I don’t know enough of what will happen to say aye.

    xizor2000s last blog post..Black September

  6. k81 says:

    AYE!!

    AYE-fu*king-AYE!!

    Fucking government we have.

    All those in favour of disposing them, say ‘aye!’

  7. Yamasam says:

    Aye !! Aye !!

    The gahmen argued that privatisation will improve efficiency. But privatisation without competition is the worst case possible.

    If what the gahmen claimed is true, then without privatisation, consumers will only pay for cost recovery albeit with some inefficiency.

    But privatisation without competition, consumers are not just paying for inefficiency, but also a lot more than cost recovery so that there is guaranteed profit and huge wage bill for the C-level executives who claim that they turned a profit.

  8. Pissed Pig says:

    I say a big “AYE”

    The “gahmen” said that employees should not be asking for pay increments because by doing so, corporation will eventually pass the higher operating cost back to consumers by rising prices. So, we as employees, cannot ask for higher pay, but companies like SP still increases price whenever they want and at whatever rate they want. Still, we cannot ask for higher pay. It all boils down to tax payers having to pay more with stagnant pay. What’s this? I am sure there are a lot people out there like myself having to slot in more and more hours to keep competitive and to protect our rice bowls. The fact is, no matter how many long hours you put in, how efficient you are, your savings still deteriates because everything is getting more and more expensive with again STAGNANT pay; in fact, Singaporeans spending power has gone down drastically. What is our “gahmen” trying to proof? I don’t understand. We are not dumb and gullible, so don’t try to beat around the bush. Tell us straigt in the face: Yes, we need more of your money to foot the F1 race for the next 5 years, to subsidize you for the so-called “gahmen” subsidy on GST hike, transport hike blah blah blah by taking money from you and give it back to you again. Crap!

  9. dk says:

    Xizor: Of cos we can’t blindly open up the energy market. There must be regulations. But I think the best way forward is to open up the market so that this 21% increase will not happen again.

    k81: Go easy on the F word. :P

Trackbacks/Pingbacks
  1. […] just recently, I’ve picked up the post on 21% bill hike! So, gahmen had become so “creative” to squeeze the middle class. Many of the gahmen […]

  2. […] People – Gerald Giam: $1 billion profit, so electricity tariffs raised 22% – Dee Kay Dot As Gee: Time to open up the energy market in Singapore[Thanks Tianhong] – CLP HK Group: CLP HK Cuts Electricity Tariff [HK cuts electricity tariffs while […]

  3. […] Giam: $1 billion profit, so electricity tariffs raised 22% [Recommended] – Dee Kay Dot As Gee: Time to open up the energy market in Singapore[Thanks Tianhong] – CLP HK Group: CLP HK Cuts Electricity Tariff [HK cuts electricity tariffs while […]

  4. […] Times picked up my article on electricity tariff hike and published a short paragraph on The Sunday Times, 5 Oct 2008. (PS: Page […]

  5. […] me that the fixed line telephone just increased its pricing when I just said few days ago that the local telco will not increase their pricing due to competitions. OK, I take back my words. But then, fixed line isn’t a major fighting ground among the 3 telco. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

CommentLuv badge